On Wednesday the U.S. government sued the Philadelphia's school
district for religious discrimination. The school district demanded that a veteran
Muslim police officer trim his beard. The school district passed a law in 2010
that mandated that beards on police and security officers be no longer than
one-quarter of an inch. Officer Siddiq Abu-Bakr keeps an untrimmed beard longer
than one-quarter of an inch in accordance to his Islamic faith. This is not the
first time an incident like this has happened. In January the Pentagon decided
to ease rules on beards and turbans in the U.S. Army. Abu-Bakr has maintained
an untrimmed beard for his 27 years with the district. When Abu-Bakr told his
supervisor that he could not cut his beard because of beliefs, he was given a
written reprimand. After this Abu-Bakr filed a charge of racial discrimination
with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The government's
lawsuit is seeking an injunction that would force the district to adopt
non-discriminatory grooming policies.
I believe that Siddiq Abu-Bakr should be allowed to keep his
beard, as long as it is not interfering with his work. If he can still do his
job accurately and efficiently then I see no reason to cut it. I think the
grooming policy is a little too much.
This relates to AP Government and Politics because the lawsuit is
debating whether or not Abu-Bakr has the right to wear a beard in accordance
with his religion. The right to religious freedoms can be found in the first
amendment of our Constitution.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/06/us-usa-philadelphia-beard-lawsuit-idUSBREA2506720140306
I agree with you. The guy should be allowed to keep his beard as long as he can still do his job correctly and efficiently. I could see if he worked with food and they needed him to wear a hair net over his beard and he refused. However, that is not the case.
ReplyDelete